|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Wu Jiun
   |
Posted - 2008.02.02 07:45:00 -
[1]
Some nice changes for amarr. But a few questions:
1. Omen
Will it get more fitting? Because it can't be fitted competitively with 4 turrets right now.
2.Apoc
Nicely done. But for closerange it stays pretty unviable. The only reason to chose it over a geddon or abaddon when it comes to closerange would be if you'd like to use an active tank. It doesn't really have the cpu for active tank + mwd and tackling gear.
More specifcially i'd like to fit:
8 x mp2
mwd, web, scram, inject
lar, plate, triple hardeners, dcu, heat sink
Too much too ask? Keep in mind it would still get obliterated by most close range ships including those of its own race. But it would be some soloing option for this ship without stepping on gallentes/minnies toes.
3. Maller
You mention it in your blog. Will there be anything done about it?
4. Prophecy
Same as number 3.
5. Paladin/Navy Apoc
Will they also get the according change? At least the navy apoc should get it.
6. Lasers and fitting in general? Is there something planned? Are you looking into it?
However thanks for the work you've already done. You made a lot people happy i'd guess.
|
Wu Jiun
|
Posted - 2008.02.03 06:09:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Ariel Dawn
Falloff on Tracking Disruptors is perhaps the largest single Minmatar nerf in EVE.
Amarrian Pulses have almost no falloff, but Minmatar completely rely on staying out of range in falloff.
You do realize that pulses have high optimal and that tds used to be most effective against them since ages? How is it fair that tds only worked against amarr? You didn't complain back then did you?
Originally by: Ariel Dawn
A single TD will cut their DPS by approximately 40-70% (depending on large or medium ACs). The solution people are probably going to say is 'get closer'; but Minmatar ships having the lowest DPS and worst tanks really do not have that option.
Yeah, if i am td'd by a recon cruiser while i fly my geddon i have an extremely easy time of getting close. This sounds exactly like someone whining about speed fits because he's too stubborn to accept that its a viable tactic.
Originally by: Ariel Dawn
Please re-think falloff reductions on TDs or introduce new ways to increase falloff and counter the effect they will have on ACs.
Maybe another script for the tracking computer? That sounds reasonable. However there is no valid argument why minnies (a turret race) shouldn't be affected by tds you know.
|
Wu Jiun
|
Posted - 2008.02.11 14:15:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Wu Jiun on 11/02/2008 14:16:33
Originally by: Ravoc
ECM got nerfed in general strength for the sake of balance.
Sensor Dampening got nerfed in general strength for the sake of balance.
Now it's time to nerf Tracking Disruption in general strength too.
Td's were nerfed with script introduction in the same way as damps. So get your facts straight before you come here crying.
Edit: Up to now pulses were the only close range weapons that suffered from range reduction in any noticeable way. That wasn't a balance problem now was it? But hey if poor minnies get ewared we need a nerf asap.
|
Wu Jiun
|
Posted - 2008.02.11 14:18:00 -
[4]
Originally by: SkyCrane
How do I change my nick to "Nobody"? I really think i should, seeing as I do use both tracking computers and enhancers when I use pulse.
In Pvp? Maybe nobody isn't that good of a choice. How about "i can't fit a pulse boat"?
|
|
|
| |
|